Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Chebi identifiers of chemical species #36

Open
DeepaMahm opened this issue Sep 19, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Chebi identifiers of chemical species #36

DeepaMahm opened this issue Sep 19, 2019 · 2 comments
Labels
feature New feature or request

Comments

@DeepaMahm
Copy link

Hi @matthiaskoenig

When substrates are mapped to chebi ids
For example,

chebi': 'CHEBI_15846',
  'comment': '#8# isoenzyme beta3,beta3, 0.1 M sodium phospahte buffer, pH '
             '7.5, 25°C <20>',
  'data': '710 {NAD+}',
  'refs': [20],
  'substrate': 'NAD+',
  'units': 'mM',
  'value': 710.0

Is it possible to map the secondary chebi ids of a compound too?

For instance on bigg database apart from CHEBI:15846 , four secondary ids are given. This will be helpful for mapping brenda compounds to compounds present in a kinetic model.

@matthiaskoenig
Copy link
Owner

Hi @DeepaMahm,
Yes, this is still an open task.

I am in the process of doing a more comprehensive mapping to other databases and resources. But this will be a bit more general solution which will allow to take a given CHEBI id and then get all the secondary database links (including the secondary CHEBI ids).

M

@matthiaskoenig matthiaskoenig added the feature New feature or request label Sep 19, 2019
@matthiaskoenig matthiaskoenig self-assigned this Jun 30, 2020
@clayton-r
Copy link

clayton-r commented Jul 31, 2020

most of the CHEBI x-references can also be mapped via the MetaNetX chem_xrefs file here:

https://www.metanetx.org/cgi-bin/mnxget/mnxref/chem_xref.tsv

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants