Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 26, 2024. It is now read-only.

Fix client_reader worker being able to handle /context requests #3597

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 24, 2018

Conversation

erikjohnston
Copy link
Member

Turns out I didn't test it as well as I thought....

This allows us to handle /context/ requests on the client_reader worker
without having to pull in all the various stream handlers (e.g.
precence, typing, pushers etc). The only thing the token gets used for
is pagination, and that ignores everything but the room portion of the
token.
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
Add support for client_reader to handle more APIs
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I used .misc here on the assumption that this will automagically get merged with the changelog entry for #3555

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

mmkay. it should probably be a .feature, then?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh yes

Copy link
Member

@richvdh richvdh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
Add support for client_reader to handle more APIs
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

mmkay. it should probably be a .feature, then?

@richvdh richvdh assigned erikjohnston and unassigned richvdh Jul 24, 2018
@erikjohnston erikjohnston merged commit 1e5dbdc into develop Jul 24, 2018
@erikjohnston erikjohnston deleted the erikj/did_forget branch September 20, 2018 13:57
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants