Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify that invite->knock is *not* a valid transition #1717

Merged

Conversation

kegsay
Copy link
Member

@kegsay kegsay commented Jan 23, 2024

This reverts #1175

See #1710

Signed-off-by: Kegan Dougal kegan@matrix.org

Preview: https://pr1717--matrix-spec-previews.netlify.app

@kegsay kegsay requested a review from a team as a code owner January 23, 2024 17:12
@richvdh richvdh changed the title Clarify that invite->knock is not a valid transition Clarify that invite->knock is *not* a valid transition Jan 25, 2024
Copy link
Member

@richvdh richvdh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As with matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals#4091: I think this is the right thing to do, but I would like opinions from others.

@richvdh
Copy link
Member

richvdh commented Jan 25, 2024

/cc @deepbluev7 and @Gnuxie on this as well

@richvdh
Copy link
Member

richvdh commented Jan 25, 2024

Also worth linking here: a complement test that asserts that what is implemented matches what this PR says: matrix-org/complement#702.

Copy link
Member

@dbkr dbkr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, I agree this is the correct way out of the mess, and doubly so with the complement test.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants