Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for HSes (or ASes) to participate in a room irrespective of whether members are present (SPEC-160) #499

Closed
matrixbot opened this issue Apr 27, 2015 · 4 comments
Labels
feature Suggestion for a significant extension which needs considerable consideration p2

Comments

@matrixbot
Copy link
Member

matrixbot commented Apr 27, 2015

Currently, a room can only be replicated on a HS if that HS has a user present in the room. This introduces some potential limitations:

  • You can't deliberately replicate a room over a cluster of HSes for HA
  • The HS (or AS) can't participate in a room as an admin superuser as suggested in https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/issues/498, to ensure there's always a 'god' user present in case of disaster.
  • You can't have invisible AS users
  • ...probably others i've forgotten.

(Imported from https://matrix.org/jira/browse/SPEC-160)

(Reported by @ara4n)

@matrixbot
Copy link
Member Author

Jira watchers: @erikjohnston @ara4n

@matrixbot
Copy link
Member Author

Other use cases:

  • Allow HSes to have aliases for rooms even if all its users have left.
  • Allow rooms to be kept alive if all users leave.

-- @erikjohnston

@matrixbot
Copy link
Member Author

One way to implement this is by allowing generic entities to send events rather than just users; where entity here is probably just users and servers.

-- @erikjohnston

@matrixbot matrixbot added the p2 label Oct 28, 2016
@matrixbot matrixbot changed the title Support for HSes (or ASes) to participate in a room irrespective of whether members are present Support for HSes (or ASes) to participate in a room irrespective of whether members are present (SPEC-160) Oct 31, 2016
@matrixbot matrixbot added the feature Suggestion for a significant extension which needs considerable consideration label Nov 7, 2016
@richvdh
Copy link
Member

richvdh commented Aug 11, 2017

seems to be a duplicate of matrix-org/matrix-spec#137

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature Suggestion for a significant extension which needs considerable consideration p2
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants