Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

RISC-V images #268

Closed
wholtz opened this issue Mar 1, 2023 · 4 comments
Closed

RISC-V images #268

wholtz opened this issue Mar 1, 2023 · 4 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@wholtz
Copy link
Member

wholtz commented Mar 1, 2023

micromamba is now building for linux/riscv64. Currently none of our base images are built for this platform. But there are pre-release builds of Debian (12) bookworm for riscv64. When Debian bookworm launches (mid-2023), we can add the riscv64 images.

mamba-org/mamba#2329
@wholtz
Copy link
Member Author

wholtz commented Jul 9, 2023

debian:bookworm is out, but now I'm not seeing linux/riscv64 builds on Dockerhub....

@wholtz wholtz added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 25, 2023
@ifsheldon
Copy link

You can take a look at this? https://hub.docker.com/u/riscv64

@wholtz
Copy link
Member Author

wholtz commented Oct 13, 2023

Interesting. I wonder why they tag the images differently than the supported Debian images.

I don't see a clean way to make use of these images without a bunch of work to keep any mambaorg/micromaba riscv64 image tags aligned with the platforms we currently offer.

@wholtz
Copy link
Member Author

wholtz commented Oct 10, 2024

micromamba isn't regularly being built for riscv64 and conda-forge doesn't really support riscv64 packages yet. So I'm going to close this for now.

@wholtz wholtz closed this as completed Oct 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@wholtz @ifsheldon