VUCC Gridsquares Map & Grid Counts #514
mwimages
started this conversation in
Ideas / Feature Requests
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I am a 100% portable station and frequent rover with several Station Profiles. When I initially uploaded my full log into Cloudlog (from every operating location, including those that are outside of my 200km VUCC circle boundary), I experienced the following two problems:
1.) The Analytics > Gridsquares map displayed every grid worked from all my Station Profiles, regardless of whether I worked them from locations outside my VUCC boundary. I love that this map is publicly viewable, but not that it gave an inaccurate view of the grids I needed.
2.) The Awards > VUCC counts only counted the grids worked from the Active Profile. There was no way to see the count from all Station Profiles within my VUCC boundary.
Currently, my workaround is to log only those stations that I work within my VUCC boundary, but I'd like to use Cloudlog while I'm out roving as well.
Describe the solution you'd like
Can we add a toggle in each Station Profile to indicate if the profile location is within my VUCC boundary? This could then be used to limit the Analytics > Gridsquares map to just those that users have worked within the rules of their VUCC award as well as to offer a complete count of worked grids somewhere on the Awards > VUCC screen.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Another solution would be the ability to create Awards Profiles similar to how awards are set up through LoTW. Users would assign certain rules to their award profiles (callsigns, date ranges, gridsquares, etc.). This would be an awesome way to allow having more than one VUCC award count, which I believe is an option that no other logging software (besides LoTW) has implemented.
Additional context
A similar solution could be used for other awards that limit operating zones. (WAS, etc.)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions