-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Missing some camera devices in HA #199
Comments
Hi Luca, |
Hi Maciej, |
Thanks for the details. Basically the integration communicates with the NVR using ISAPI protocol. ONVIF is something else. I will check if ONVIF cameras are somehow shared by NVR. |
Here is the diagnostic report: https://pastebin.com/7W5LtgZe I understand that the integration uses ISAPI to communicate with the NVR. All the cameras are configured in the NVR, the difference in the protocol (hikvision or onvif) is only between the NVR and the cameras. Here you can see a screenshot of all the 18 cameras inside the NVR: Thanks |
Thanks, that explains a lot, it looks all ONVIF cameras have the same serial number, that's why they are merged into 1. |
That's right, I checked in the NVR and they have the same serial number also there, but that's not the correct one. |
Hello everyone,
I have a NVR model DS-7732NI-M4 with firmware V5.03.010 build 240606 and 18 IP cameras connected.
HA version 2024.8.1 with integration version 1.0.17.
In the past everything was working well, all the cameras were configured in HA both as devices and entities, then I think after the NVR firmware update the camera devices got renamed, so I deleted the integration and reconfigured it.
After this, the integration creates only 11 camera devices in HA, instead of 18 cameras. The streange thing is that all the 18 cameras are present in HA as entities, but only 11 of them as both devices and entities.
Also, the cameras don't have the sub stream anymore in HA, but only the main stream.
In the diagnostic report I see all the 18 cameras (https://pastebin.com/KJS0ZUW0).
Can someone help me identify the issue?
Thanks
Luca
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: