From db04059b971fa53f7746fba3ec43c5383d00dd0b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Esko Luontola <esko@luontola.fi>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 23:26:51 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Test for reproducing issue #121

---
 .../net/orfjackal/retrolambda/test/LambdaTest.java | 14 +++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/end-to-end-tests/src/test/java/net/orfjackal/retrolambda/test/LambdaTest.java b/end-to-end-tests/src/test/java/net/orfjackal/retrolambda/test/LambdaTest.java
index 2e976543..07b1384f 100644
--- a/end-to-end-tests/src/test/java/net/orfjackal/retrolambda/test/LambdaTest.java
+++ b/end-to-end-tests/src/test/java/net/orfjackal/retrolambda/test/LambdaTest.java
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 
 import net.orfjackal.retrolambda.test.anotherpackage.DifferentPackageBase;
 import org.apache.commons.lang.SystemUtils;
-import org.junit.Test;
+import org.junit.*;
 import org.objectweb.asm.*;
 import org.objectweb.asm.Type;
 
@@ -247,6 +247,18 @@ private static String privateClassMethod() {
         return "foo";
     }
 
+
+    @Test
+    @Ignore // TODO: fix issue #121
+    public void enclosing_method_of_anonymous_class_inside_lambda_expression() throws Exception {
+        Callable<Object> lambda = () -> new Object() {
+        };
+        Class<?> anonymousClass = lambda.call().getClass();
+
+        assertThat(anonymousClass.getEnclosingMethod().getName(),
+                startsWith("lambda$enclosing_method_of_anonymous_class_inside_lambda_expression$"));
+    }
+
     /**
      * We could make private lambda implementation methods package-private,
      * so that the lambda class may call them, but we should not make any