You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello, In the origin paper, the author wrote "We provide e(ci, ri) as a prefix instead of inserting it at position i because M is not yet finetuned on any examples containing API calls, so inserting it in the middle of x would interrupt the flow and not align with patterns in the pretraining corpus, thus hurting perplexity." on the footnote of page 3.
However I found that u seem to inserting API call in the origin sentence when calculating loss.
What may I miss?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
RuijieH
changed the title
About
About the Filtering API Calls implementation
Jan 7, 2024
Hello, In the origin paper, the author wrote "We provide e(ci, ri) as a prefix instead of inserting it at position i because M is not yet finetuned on any examples containing API calls, so inserting it in the middle of x would interrupt the flow and not align with patterns in the pretraining corpus, thus hurting perplexity." on the footnote of page 3.
However I found that u seem to inserting API call in the origin sentence when calculating loss.
What may I miss?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: