Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

About the Filtering API Calls implementation #18

Open
RuijieH opened this issue Jan 7, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

About the Filtering API Calls implementation #18

RuijieH opened this issue Jan 7, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@RuijieH
Copy link

RuijieH commented Jan 7, 2024

Hello, In the origin paper, the author wrote "We provide e(ci, ri) as a prefix instead of inserting it at position i because M is not yet finetuned on any examples containing API calls, so inserting it in the middle of x would interrupt the flow and not align with patterns in the pretraining corpus, thus hurting perplexity." on the footnote of page 3.

However I found that u seem to inserting API call in the origin sentence when calculating loss.

What may I miss?

@RuijieH RuijieH changed the title About About the Filtering API Calls implementation Jan 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant