Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

allow 0-RTT resumption if the server's stream limit was increased #3086

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 16, 2021

Conversation

marten-seemann
Copy link
Member

Part of the fix for #3061.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 11, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #3086 (3588cdd) into master (3bce408) will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 87.50%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3086      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   85.72%   85.71%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         131      131              
  Lines        9520     9520              
==========================================
- Hits         8161     8160       -1     
- Misses        990      991       +1     
  Partials      369      369              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
internal/handshake/crypto_setup.go 66.19% <0.00%> (ø)
internal/wire/transport_parameters.go 89.08% <100.00%> (ø)
internal/utils/rand.go 62.50% <0.00%> (-12.50%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3bce408...3588cdd. Read the comment docs.

@marten-seemann marten-seemann merged commit e5a83e1 into master Mar 16, 2021
@marten-seemann marten-seemann deleted the accept-0rtt-on-stream-limit-increase branch March 17, 2021 09:50
@aschmahmann aschmahmann mentioned this pull request May 14, 2021
71 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants