From 2e015ea756c0f9e9afcd5a668c3a18b9a68962d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Carmine Scarpitta <carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2022 13:58:01 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] topotests: update interface in SRv6 topotest

Previously, routes leaked from one VRF to another VRF were associated
with the original nexthop interface.

Due to this change, the `bgp_srv6l3vpn_route_leak` topotest always fails
because it still expects the nexthop interface.

This commit fixes the expected interface name in the
`bgp_srv6l3vpn_route_leak` topotest.

Signed-off-by: Carmine Scarpitta <carmine.scarpitta@uniroma2.it>
Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <louis.scalbert@6wind.com>
---
 .../bgp_srv6l3vpn_route_leak/pe1/results/vrf20_ipv4.json        | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tests/topotests/bgp_srv6l3vpn_route_leak/pe1/results/vrf20_ipv4.json b/tests/topotests/bgp_srv6l3vpn_route_leak/pe1/results/vrf20_ipv4.json
index 9f78447255ff..2ce936b29145 100644
--- a/tests/topotests/bgp_srv6l3vpn_route_leak/pe1/results/vrf20_ipv4.json
+++ b/tests/topotests/bgp_srv6l3vpn_route_leak/pe1/results/vrf20_ipv4.json
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
                 {
                     "fib": true,
                     "directlyConnected": true,
-                    "interfaceName": "eth0",
+                    "interfaceName": "vrf10",
                     "vrf": "vrf10",
                     "active": true
                 }