-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 335
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
User-provided initial positions (follow-up) #353
Comments
Hi @vkremenetski , is it possible to provide a working example that reproduces this error? |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
@Stale stop |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
Is this still relevant? If so, what is blocking it? Is there anything you can do to help move it forward? This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. |
I would like to have some feature where I can initialize the particle positions of the swarm.
I looked at post #119 with regards to this issue but when I tried to use the suggested workaround (optimizer.pos = my_own_positions.copy()) something odd happened: the optimizer returned a best cost that was far higher than the cost that was present at those initial positions.
This leads me to suspect that either the optimizer doesn't look at the cost at the initial positions of the particles (which would be very odd) or there's something else at play here that's going amiss.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: