Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

User-provided initial positions (follow-up) #353

Closed
vkremenetski opened this issue Jul 19, 2019 · 5 comments
Closed

User-provided initial positions (follow-up) #353

vkremenetski opened this issue Jul 19, 2019 · 5 comments
Labels
question Questions / problems issued by users stale Not much activity here

Comments

@vkremenetski
Copy link

I would like to have some feature where I can initialize the particle positions of the swarm.

I looked at post #119 with regards to this issue but when I tried to use the suggested workaround (optimizer.pos = my_own_positions.copy()) something odd happened: the optimizer returned a best cost that was far higher than the cost that was present at those initial positions.

This leads me to suspect that either the optimizer doesn't look at the cost at the initial positions of the particles (which would be very odd) or there's something else at play here that's going amiss.

@ljvmiranda921 ljvmiranda921 added the question Questions / problems issued by users label Jul 31, 2019
@ljvmiranda921
Copy link
Owner

Hi @vkremenetski , is it possible to provide a working example that reproduces this error?

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Aug 30, 2019

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale Not much activity here label Aug 30, 2019
@ljvmiranda921
Copy link
Owner

@Stale stop

@stale stale bot removed the stale Not much activity here label Aug 30, 2019
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Sep 29, 2019

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale Not much activity here label Sep 29, 2019
@stale stale bot closed this as completed Oct 2, 2019
@ljvmiranda921 ljvmiranda921 reopened this Oct 2, 2019
@stale stale bot removed the stale Not much activity here label Oct 2, 2019
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Nov 1, 2019

Is this still relevant? If so, what is blocking it? Is there anything you can do to help move it forward?

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs.

@stale stale bot added the stale Not much activity here label Nov 1, 2019
@stale stale bot closed this as completed Nov 4, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Questions / problems issued by users stale Not much activity here
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants