Should I use Conversation Summary Memory? #25904
JanPalasek
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 1 comment
-
I believe both |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I have a langgraph (a runnable langchain component), where I want to record only its input (human message) and output (ai message). I would like to have some kind of memory class, which can record the messages after they passed through the graph and record the answers.
This purpose is fulfilled by
ConversationSummaryMemory
, which does exactly that. However, I noticed that its missing from the newest documentation. Should I use it? Is it deprecated? I noticed that one of its mixin ancestors is.I also noticed in the newest documentation how the summary is handled. Is this the new recommended way?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions