Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Lock file maintenance #63

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 14, 2022
Merged

Lock file maintenance #63

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 14, 2022

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Feb 7, 2022

WhiteSource Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Update Change
lockFileMaintenance All locks refreshed

🔧 This Pull Request updates lock files to use the latest dependency versions.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: "before 5am on monday" (UTC).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, click this checkbox.

This PR has been generated by WhiteSource Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from kunalnagar as a code owner February 7, 2022 00:07
@renovate renovate bot added the renovate label Feb 7, 2022
@kunalnagar kunalnagar merged commit 398c949 into main Feb 14, 2022
@kunalnagar kunalnagar deleted the renovate/lock-file-maintenance branch February 14, 2022 01:02
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2022
[skip ci]

### [1.6.2](v1.6.1...v1.6.2) (2022-02-14)

### Chores

* Lock file maintenance ([#63](#63)) ([398c949](398c949))
@github-actions
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.6.2 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants