-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
document maintenance of kubernetes-milestone-maintainers GH team #2424
Labels
sig/release
Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Release.
Comments
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
needs-sig
Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one.
label
Jul 26, 2018
/sig pm |
k8s-ci-robot
added
sig/pm
sig/release
Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Release.
and removed
needs-sig
Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one.
labels
Jul 26, 2018
Great minds, @tpepper: kubernetes/enhancements#590 (comment) |
RFC for |
/assign |
Added in kubernetes/sig-release#239 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Who should be added to and removed from the kubernetes-milestone-maintainers GH team, and when, needs documented.
https://github.com/kubernetes/sig-release/blob/1b389936697e0881dfc343f634da2d37f03604ff/release-team/role-handbooks/ci-signal/README.md previously referred to but that and https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/project-managers/README.md#joining-the-group now 404's as #2357 removed it. The documentation there perhaps was more about joining the kubernetes-pm team, but should have been superseded by a process for kubernetes-milestone-maintainers.
It's now possible (see kubernetes/test-infra@19b225c) for repos to have their own milestone maintainers lists, but kubernetes-milestone-maintainers remains the default and is managed in an ad hoc by SIG-Release and the release team lead. But that's likely excessive in most cases.
Probably a simple process here works fine if it’s a limited number of people per sig/repo and we have a simple process like sig lead tells release lead who to add/remove…something light weight could work just fine I reckon. Only if sigs are rapidly adding/removing lots of people, then probably better for them to manage their own milestone team.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: