Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Multus Daemonset does not configure a priorityClassName #11304

Open
Mosibi opened this issue Jun 18, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Multus Daemonset does not configure a priorityClassName #11304

Mosibi opened this issue Jun 18, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug.

Comments

@Mosibi
Copy link
Contributor

Mosibi commented Jun 18, 2024

What happened?

The Multus Daemonset does not configure a priorityClassName like other CNI's, which can cause the Multus Pod to be preempted in favor of less important Pods

What did you expect to happen?

Multus Pods should configure a priorityClassName, preferable system-node-critical like other CNI's

How can we reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible)?

The command kubectl get pods -A -o json | jq '.items[] | select (.spec.priorityClassName == null) | "Namespace: " + .metadata.namespace + " Name: " + .metadata.name' which lists Pods that do not have a priorityClassName returns "multus" pods.

OS

not important

Version of Ansible

not important

Version of Python

not important

Version of Kubespray (commit)

24dc4ce

Network plugin used

calico

Full inventory with variables

not important

Command used to invoke ansible

not important

Output of ansible run

not important

Anything else we need to know

I will create a pull-request to add priorityClassName support for Multus

@Mosibi Mosibi added the kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. label Jun 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant