Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Drop logical model mapping tests #320

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 29, 2024

Conversation

isinyaaa
Copy link
Contributor

@isinyaaa isinyaaa commented Aug 29, 2024

Related: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHOAIENG-12015

Follow-up to #295 (review).

Description

How Has This Been Tested?

Merge criteria:

  • All the commits have been signed-off (To pass the DCO check)
  • The commits have meaningful messages; the author will squash them after approval or in case of manual merges will ask to merge with squash.
  • Testing instructions have been added in the PR body (for PRs involving changes that are not immediately obvious).
  • The developer has manually tested the changes and verified that the changes work.
  • Code changes follow the kubeflow contribution guidelines.

Signed-off-by: Isabella do Amaral <idoamara@redhat.com>
@isinyaaa isinyaaa force-pushed the push-uutmvsmzxvzv branch 2 times, most recently from 51fd6d2 to 82d8350 Compare August 29, 2024 14:03
@isinyaaa
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc: @tarilabs

Copy link
Member

@tarilabs tarilabs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you, I fully support for this test removal now being an obsolete test, per link provided.

/lgtm

one small question please?

Since [1] the Python client doesn't access MLMD directly, instead
routing requests through the MR server, there's no need to check for
matching implementations.

[1]: 9b9be50 "Switch Python client backend to use REST (kubeflow#152)"

Signed-off-by: Isabella do Amaral <idoamara@redhat.com>
@google-oss-prow google-oss-prow bot removed the lgtm label Aug 29, 2024
@isinyaaa isinyaaa requested a review from tarilabs August 29, 2024 14:36
Copy link
Member

@tarilabs tarilabs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you Isabella, approving per #295 (review) and related discussions.

Also thanks @lampajr for chiming in

/lgtm
/approve

@google-oss-prow google-oss-prow bot added the lgtm label Aug 29, 2024
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: tarilabs

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@google-oss-prow google-oss-prow bot merged commit 467e4fb into kubeflow:main Aug 29, 2024
14 checks passed
@isinyaaa isinyaaa deleted the push-uutmvsmzxvzv branch August 29, 2024 17:21
Al-Pragliola pushed a commit to Al-Pragliola/model-registry that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2024
* CONTRIBUTING: Get rid of remote-mlmd recommendations

Signed-off-by: Isabella do Amaral <idoamara@redhat.com>

* robot: drop logical model mapping tests

Since [1] the Python client doesn't access MLMD directly, instead
routing requests through the MR server, there's no need to check for
matching implementations.

[1]: 9b9be50 "Switch Python client backend to use REST (kubeflow#152)"

Signed-off-by: Isabella do Amaral <idoamara@redhat.com>

---------

Signed-off-by: Isabella do Amaral <idoamara@redhat.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants