Replies: 1 comment
-
To 1: So for now I can do everything I want, but more flexibility, especially regarding the generated files, would be nice. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I want to generate more than just
XyzResolver
interfaces.Like
XyzResolverImpl
andXyzService
interfaces.Describe the solution you'd like
className
without the suffix.@SchemaMapping
annotation.Current workarounds
I can split the current
className
by using?keep_before("Resolver")
. That works but bloats the template, since that's done in numerous places.But generating the
@SchemaMapping
is currently impossible I think, as I have no way of knowing the type.Currently I just have them in one file. That's not so bad and is not a priority, but it would be very nice to expand this even further in the future, so that eg. the service interfaces lie in their own package. A generic mechanism would be awesome so you could generate variable amounts of files into variable directories without having them hard coded as
model
andapi
.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions