Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ability for ApiServerSource to extract information from remote clusters. #3785

Closed
nachocano opened this issue Aug 5, 2020 · 6 comments
Closed
Labels
area/sources kind/feature-request lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete.
Milestone

Comments

@nachocano
Copy link
Contributor

Problem
In #3295 we asked for feedback regarding Core Sources. One ask was to allow ApiServerSource to specify a kubeconfig in order to be able to point to a different cluster. See #3295 (comment).

Persona:
Developer

Exit Criteria
ApiServerSource can connect to a different cluster.

Additional context (optional)
See #3295

@grantr grantr added the priority/awaiting-more-evidence Lowest priority. Possibly useful, but not yet enough support to actually get it done. label Aug 17, 2020
@grantr
Copy link
Contributor

grantr commented Aug 17, 2020

Decided against adding this for v1beta1. @arzarif how important is this feature for you?

@arzarif
Copy link

arzarif commented Aug 31, 2020

Hi @grantr - apologies for the delayed response. I'd say it's an important feature, but not a pressing one currently (for me anyway). The specific use case I had in mind was pulling in events from across multiple clusters into an event bus that resides within a centralized operations cluster; my intention was to be able to kick off Tekton-based pipelines from this operations cluster using these events.

@lberk lberk added priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete. and removed priority/awaiting-more-evidence Lowest priority. Possibly useful, but not yet enough support to actually get it done. labels Nov 2, 2020
@lberk lberk added this to the Backlog milestone Nov 2, 2020
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 1, 2021

This issue is stale because it has been open for 90 days with no
activity. It will automatically close after 30 more days of
inactivity. Reopen the issue with /reopen. Mark the issue as
fresh by adding the comment /remove-lifecycle stale.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Feb 1, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this as completed Mar 4, 2021
@lionelvillard lionelvillard reopened this Mar 4, 2021
@lionelvillard
Copy link
Member

/remove-lifecycle stale

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Mar 4, 2021
@Shashankft9
Copy link
Member

I was also evaluating the best way to deploy knative in such architecture where there are multiple user clusters, to make it central I would run serving in just one cluster and this is where it would make sense to have eventing deployed in the same cluster as well and then the source to connect with different clusters using kubeconfig.
+1 for this feature

@github-actions
Copy link

This issue is stale because it has been open for 90 days with no
activity. It will automatically close after 30 more days of
inactivity. Reopen the issue with /reopen. Mark the issue as
fresh by adding the comment /remove-lifecycle stale.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jun 29, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/sources kind/feature-request lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants