From d97a9fff471b06223277ae625cd2df55291b9461 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Antonio Salazar Cardozo Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2020 23:17:36 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Tweak spec reasoning around collateral rebalancing --- docs/bonding/index.adoc | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/bonding/index.adoc b/docs/bonding/index.adoc index 508b50206..04e7d3a33 100644 --- a/docs/bonding/index.adoc +++ b/docs/bonding/index.adoc @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ Since <> are denominated per BTC in custody (with overcollateralization factored in), a BTC value drop against the bonded asset translates in lower fees for Signers. Note that this does not create any issue for TBTC reserves, but it makes the system less -attractive to signers looking to earn interest via fees on their assets. +attractive to signers earning fees on their assets. Signers SHOULD buy TBTC from the markets in anticipation of such overly overcollateralized Deposits and they SHOULD use it to redeem these positions,