Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Peer Review #2 #4

Open
sophiabrothers1 opened this issue Sep 25, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Peer Review #2 #4

sophiabrothers1 opened this issue Sep 25, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@sophiabrothers1
Copy link

Opening statement summary
You have a lot to complete with the rest of your paper, but the parts you have done are strong

Strong positive points

  • Your graphs are very clear and I understand what you are trying to say
  • Your introduction is pretty fleshed out and well articulated
  • Limitations for data are valid and make sense and are important to include so its good to see
  • Sketches look good
  • Data parts of the repository look good
  • LLM is documented

Critical improvements needed

  • Finish the paper
  • Update your readme

Suggestions for improvement:

  • Add figure captions
  • Clean up the graphs (overlapping text)

Please consider adding/changing/removing:

  • Add your GitHub repo to the paper
  • I would include a table using knitr

Evaluation:
The repository is very well done for the parts you have completed, and I love your introduction. Finish your paper and clean up the readme, etc and you should be in very good shape

Estimated mark: 35/100

Reason: the estimated mark is low because there is a lot left to be completed. This mark would go up dramatically with the completion of your paper

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant