forked from andreamazzella/r4asme
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
r4asme15 additive.Rmd
288 lines (224 loc) · 10.1 KB
/
r4asme15 additive.Rmd
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
---
title: "15: Additive and multiplicative models"
subtitle: "R 4 ASME"
author: Author – Andrea Mazzella [(GitHub)](https://github.com/andreamazzella)
output: html_notebook
---
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
## Contents
* *Draft.* Need to research additive Poisson.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
## Packages and options
```{r message=FALSE, warning=FALSE}
# Load packages
library("haven")
library("magrittr")
library("broom")
library("mgcv") # additive models
library("tidyverse")
# Limit significant digits to 3, reduce scientific notation
options(digits = 3, scipen = 9)
```
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# 1.
(pen and paper question)
# 2.
## 2a. Data import, exploration, and management
Import and explore `goldmine.dta`. It contains data from a historical cohort studies exploring the risk factors for tubercolosis among male gold miners in South Africa.
These are the variables of interest.
**Outcome*:
- `tb` (tubercolosis diagnosis, 0/1)
**Exposures*:
- `hiv` (HIV status at entry: 0/1)
- `silic` (silicosis grad: 0 = "none", 1 = "possible", 2 = "early", 3 = "advanced")
**Time*:
-`entry` (date of entry, formatted as number of days)
-`exit` (date of exit, formatted as number of days)
-`dob` (date of birth, formatted as number of days)
```{r import, include=FALSE}
# Import the dataset
gold <- read_stata("goldmine.dta") %>% select(tb, hiv, silic, entry, exit)
# Explore data types
glimpse(gold)
```
We need to transform these days into person-years, and to remove observations with a missing silicosis value. Also, let's factorise and label the exposures.
As we won't need to do Lexis expansions or Cox regressions, we don't need to `Surv()` our data.
```{r data management}
gold %<>% mutate(pyears = (exit - entry) / 365.25,
hiv = factor(hiv, levels = c(0, 1), labels = c("neg", "pos")),
silic = factor(silic,
levels = 0:3,
labels = c("none", "possible", "early", "advanced"))) %>%
drop_na(silic) %>%
select(-c("entry", "exit"))
```
Let's summarise this subsetted data to calculate cases, person-years and incidence rates of TB according to HIV status and then silicosis.
```{r rates}
# General summary
summary(gold)
sum(gold$pyears)
# Incidence by HIV
gold %>% group_by(hiv) %>% summarise(count = sum(tb),
person_years = sum(pyears),
rate_percent = sum(tb) / sum(pyears) * 100)
# Incidence by silicosis
gold %>% group_by(silic) %>% summarise(count = sum(tb),
person_years = sum(pyears),
rate_percent = sum(tb) / sum(pyears) * 100)
```
Participants were followed up for a maximum of 6 years. Total of 9947 person-years. Incidence rate 1.1% in HIV neg, 4.9% in PLHIV.
## 2b. Crude effect of HIV
Estimate the crude effect of HIV on TB rate with Poisson regression.
```{r}
crude_hiv <- glm(tb ~ hiv + offset(log(pyears)),
family = "poisson",
gold)
tidy(crude_hiv, exponentiate = T, conf.int = T)
```
HR (HIV+ vs HIV-) 4.59 (3.48-6.10)
## 2c. Crude effect of silicosis
Do the same but for silicosis.
```{r}
crude_silic <- glm(tb ~ silic + offset(log(pyears)),
family = "poisson",
gold)
tidy(crude_silic, exponentiate = T, conf.int = T)
```
HR (baseline: no silicosis)
- possible silicosis: 1.83 (1.29-2.54)
- early silicosis: 3.53 (2.13-5.53)
- advanced silicosis: 3.58 (2.31-5.35)
## 2d. Biological plausibility
(pen and paper question)
## 2e. Multivariable Poisson with multiplicative effects
Now examine the combined effects of HIV and silicosis in a multivariable model. Let's use first a multiplicative model, and let's assess if there's interaction on the multiplicative scale.
```{r}
# Multiplicative without interaction
multipl <- glm(tb ~ hiv + silic + offset(log(pyears)),
family = "poisson",
gold)
# Multiplicative with interaction
mul_int <- glm(tb ~ hiv * silic + offset(log(pyears)),
family = "poisson",
gold)
# LRT
epiDisplay::lrtest(multipl, mul_int)
# Output from first model
tidy(multipl, conf.int = T, exponentiate = T)
```
LRT for interaction, p = 0.43. There is no evidence of interaction on the multiplicative scale.
The rate of tubercolosis in HIV-positive men with advacned silicosis was 20 times higher compared to HIV-negative men without silicosis (HR = 4.82 × 4.12 = 19.9)
### 2e2. Comparing expected and observed cases with multiplicative model
Now obtain the predicted number of tubercolosis cases across HIV and silicosis strata from this model.
Note that you can nest `predict()` inside `mutate()`, so you don't have to add a permanent predicted variable to your dataset.
```{r}
gold %>% mutate(predicted_TB = predict(multipl, type = "response")) %>%
group_by(hiv, silic) %>%
summarise(observed_TB = sum(as.numeric(tb)),
predicted_TB = sum(predicted_TB),
OE_difference = abs(observed_TB - predicted_TB))
```
For all covariates, the observed number of TB cases is similar to the predicted number under the multiplicative model.
## 2f. Multivariable Poisson with additive effects
Now fit the same model, but with additive effects, as there is biological plausibility for additive effects.
Is there evidence of interaction on this scale?
Function `gam()` from package {mgcv} *should* be able to fit (mixed) generalised additive models.
There's also `gam()` from {gam}.
*-----------*
*---ISSUE---* I don't know how to use `gam()` with Poisson and an identity link.
*-----------* Should I remove pyears from the offset?
```{r broken}
# library("mgcv")
# gold %<>% mutate(tb_rate = (tb / pyears))
#
# ?mgcv::gam()
#
# # Additive model without interaction - broken
# additive <- mgcv::gam(tb_rate ~ hiv + silic + offset(log(pyears)),
# family = poisson(link = "identity"),
# gold)
# summary(additive)
# coef(additive) %>% exp()
#
# # Additive model with interaction - broken
# additive_inter <- mgcv::gam(tb_rate ~ hiv * silic + offset(log(pyears)),
# family = poisson(link = "identity"),
# gold)
# summary(additive_inter)
# coef(additive_inter) %>% exp()
#
# # LRT
# epiDisplay::lrtest(additive, additive_inter)
#
# # gam::gam()
# library("gam")
# additive_2 <- gam::gam(tb ~ hiv + silic,
# family = poisson(),
# gold)
# ?gam::gam()
# tidy(additive_2)
```
> Below: Stata stuff
The analysis is performed using the glm command (see Appendix to Session 16) using the rate
(rather than the number of TB cases) as the outcome. First perform a LRT for interaction by
comparing the log likelihood in the models with and without interaction:
```{stata}
gen rate = tb/pyears
glm rate i.hiv i.silic [iweight=pyears], family(poisson) link(identity)
est store A
glm rate i.hiv##i.silic [iweight=pyears], family(poisson) link(identity)
est store B
lrtest A B
```
Stata output for model 1:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| OIM
rate | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
1.hiv | .0359824 .0043567 8.26 0.000 .0274435 .0445214
|
silic |
1 | .0090604 .0037984 2.39 0.017 .0016156 .0165052
2 | .0272015 .0118625 2.29 0.022 .0039514 .0504516
3 | .0383819 .0105738 3.63 0.000 .0176577 .0591062
|
_cons | .0070582 .0011093 6.36 0.000 .004884 .0092324
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
//the link function is the transformation that is done to the outcome before analysis - in the additive model we are not transforming with the link function, but are still using poisson data
The LRT is given by 16.82 [2*(-955.979- -964.390)] which is a chi-square with 3 df, giving
p=0.0008 and so there is strong evidence of interaction on the additive scale. Note that all three
interaction terms are positive and the “main effects” are also positive (so all RRs>1), suggesting
that the effects are more than additive (multiplicative, perhaps).
### 2f2. Comparing expected and observed cases with additive model
We *should* be able to obtain the predicted number of tubercolosis cases, according to HIV status and silicosis, in the additive model, like this.
*-----------*
*---ISSUE---* This relies on a functioning model...
*-----------*
```{r broken2}
# # Broken
# gold %>% mutate(expected_rate = predict(additive, type = "response")) %>%
# group_by(hiv, silic) %>%
# summarise(observed_TB = sum(as.numeric(tb)),
# expected_TB = expected_rate * pyears,
# # expected_rate = sum(expected_rate),
# OE_difference = abs(observed_TB - expected_TB))
```
>
```{stata}
preserve
collapse (sum) tb pyears, by(hiv silic)
gen rate=tb/pyears
glm rate i.hiv i.silic [iweight=pyears], family(poisson) link(identity)
predict expectrate
gen tbexpect=expectrate*pyears
list hiv silic tb tbexpect
restore
list hiv silic tb tbexpect
```
[As the model is based on the outcome of a rate the predict command calculates the expected
rate for each of the 8 unique combinations. This predicted rate is then multiplied by the personyears to obtain the expected number of TB cases]
For some covariates, the observed number of TB cases differs markedly from the expected
number under the additive model. In summary, the strong evidence for an interaction (p=0.0008)
and the discrepancies between the observed and expected values for the additive model suggest
that the effects of HIV and silicosis do not combine additively.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------