σώμᾳτι vs σώματι

[jcuenod]

In 1 Clem 37:5, should "σώμᾳτι" be "σώματι"? I don't know what the source is for this, but I see that Loeb does not have the iota subscript. Alexandrinus is extremely clear at this point /s :(.

(this is page 1583 from the facsimile on archive.org)

[jtauber]

By Loeb do you mean Lake or Ehrman?
In the edition I have, Lake has σώμᾳτι which is what our text is based on (via OGL and checked with CCEL and Logos).

Holmes has σώματι, though.

@seumasjeltzz thoughts?

[jcuenod]

Ehrman: https://www.loebclassics.com/view/clement-first_letter/2003/pb_LCL024.103.xml

[seumasjeltzz]

My thought is that I thought we had agreed (@jtauber and I) that our text would conform to Lake even when we thought it should be corrected, unless we did a spin-off version. That is, the text is a correct digitisation of Lake.