-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 693
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CheckDigitIncreaseConsistency not working for model dig-cont_0712_s3_q.tflite #3533
Comments
As far as i know, this option is only being available for digital ROIs, but you also activated analog ROIs. |
I'm talking exactly about the that, what the description of the correction algorithm describes. But unfortunately this not available for the digital ROI model "dig-cont_0712_s3_q.tflite" Have a look at jomjol_flowcontroll/ClassFlowPostProcessing.cpp@869
The model "dig-cont_0712_s3_q.tflite" has CNNType |
With DoubleHyprid10, a different/expanded calculation is carried out, but depending on AnalogDigitTransitionStart. |
Yes, setting Made a development version of the software with activated As far as i understand the CheckDigitIncreaseConsistency is a subsequent calculation, so it might be usefull for all models classifying digits. |
Simply put the last two digits up a bit, then they should be recognized as 2.8 or 2.9. |
Great, you are right. Moving the digit ROI up by four pixel leads to a perfect classification during zero-crossing. So my original problem is solved, I no longer need the calculation of Thanks |
The Problem
I'm using a meter with a very early analog to digital transition
This results (despite other problems) to inaccuracy when the analog pointer reaches values from .8 to .99 and the lowest digit is nearly switched to the next one.
Note: Meter shows value 232.91
The parameter CheckDigitIncreaseConsistency promises some help,
but the check is skipped caused by wrong model
Using a other digit models (e.g dig-class11_1701_s2.tflite) is not an option, because they have a worse recoginition rate with my meter.
Is there a reason why the continuous output networks models are ignored?
Version
15.7.0
Logfile
Expected Behavior
Parameter CheckDigitIncreaseConsistency is effective for all digital models
Screenshots
No response
Additional Context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: