Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Motion perception in the peripheral visual field #83

Open
jinglescode opened this issue Jul 19, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Motion perception in the peripheral visual field #83

jinglescode opened this issue Jul 19, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@jinglescode
Copy link
Owner

Paper

Link: https://www.academia.edu/download/53635946/bf0016630520170623-1911-pwswo7.pdf
Year: 1990

Summary

  • performance in the temporal hemified was slightly superior to that in the nasal hemifield and depended on the orientation as well as on the direction of the motion.
  • perception of horizontal motion was better than that of vertical motion.
  • in spite of large variations, centrifugal motion was significantly more readily perceived than centripetal motion.

Results

  • results were generally better for horizontal than for vertical stimulus motion
  • results obtained at positions on the horizontal meridian appear to be better for motion toward the center (centripetal) than for that away from the center of gaze (centrifugal)
  • results obtained for centripetal motion were better than those obtained for centrifugal motion at all positions of the visual field above and below the center of gaze, both on the vertical meridian and at the oblique positions
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant