Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

The accuracy is weird #3

Closed
chingyaoc opened this issue Jun 24, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

The accuracy is weird #3

chingyaoc opened this issue Jun 24, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@chingyaoc
Copy link

Hi all, I run this code with alternating attention and VGG feature and the output accuracy is weird.
Here is what it looks like

It supposed to be 60.5 according to the paper.
Btw in step of downloading image model, I didn't see image_model folder.
@rohit789123
Copy link

There is no image_model folder

Thanks

@chingyaoc
Copy link
Author

Thanks for the reply. Btw is there codes for attention visualization?
Since readme mentioned it but I couldn't find the code for it.

@idansc
Copy link

idansc commented Jul 21, 2016 •
edited
Loading

It seems like there is a bug in the model, since it almost always produce "yes" as the answer. Not sure what the bug is yet.

Edit: remove the line that restrict the #samples to 5000 @ vqa prepro

@manli009 manli009 mentioned this issue Aug 25, 2016
Closed
@shailzajolly shailzajolly mentioned this issue Jul 9, 2018
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@idansc @rohit789123 @chingyaoc