We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
This is about Bulma.
I am not quite sure if this is an intended feature or a bug.
This is about the Bulma CSS framework
I'm using Bulma version [1.0.0] My browser is: Google Chrome I am sure this issue is not a duplicate
I expects that is-offset-on-third make one third spacing (33.3333...%), but in actually only 0.3333% spacing
is-offset-on-third
Create your own html code.
<html> <head> <link rel="stylesheet" href="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/bulma@1.0.0/css/bulma.min.css"> </head> <body> <div class="columns"> <div class="column is-one-third">first</div> <div class="column is-one-third is-offset-one-third">second</div> </div> </body> </html>
I expected that it make one third spacing (33.3333...%).
It makes 0.3333% spacing.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I encountered the same problem. It is definitely a bug because all other modifiers like is-offset-one-X have correct values like 20%, 40% etc.
is-offset-one-X
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
This is about Bulma.
I am not quite sure if this is an intended feature or a bug.
Overview of the problem
This is about the Bulma CSS framework
I'm using Bulma version [1.0.0]
My browser is: Google Chrome
I am sure this issue is not a duplicate
Description
I expects that
is-offset-on-third
make one third spacing (33.3333...%), but in actually only 0.3333% spacingSteps to Reproduce
Create your own html code.
Expected behavior
I expected that it make one third spacing (33.3333...%).
Actual behavior
It makes 0.3333% spacing.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: