You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think is not necessary having static function support. We can organize all source files in the folders and classify each class by naming group at the end (usually). Name/Refactory is immediatly. Namespaces adds a layer of complexity.
The probability of name colliding can be negligible.
Personal notes: I hate namespaces because of naming convention. In c++ class/file is typed as CamelCase and namespaces/file are typed as snake_case. As a result we could see in the same folder a set of files typed ad snake_case and CamelCase. If namespace were not exist it would have a better life.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think is not necessary having static function support. We can organize all source files in the folders and classify each class by naming group at the end (usually). Name/Refactory is immediatly. Namespaces adds a layer of complexity.
The probability of name colliding can be negligible.
Personal notes: I hate namespaces because of naming convention. In c++ class/file is typed as CamelCase and namespaces/file are typed as snake_case. As a result we could see in the same folder a set of files typed ad snake_case and CamelCase. If namespace were not exist it would have a better life.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: