Replies: 1 comment
-
Update: Looking into this more I found that running the perf script command on the machine with the older version of perf leads to a segmentation fault.
Is there a way magic-trace could propagate this error up to the user? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hey magic-trace Team!
Thank you for all the great effort that's gone into making and supporting magic-trace!
The Issue
On some performance testing machines we've noticed that our perf reports recorded by magic-trace come out fine, but the trace.fxt files are coming out very small (usually 88 bytes).
The Question
Have you encountered this issue before? Is the decoding step silently failing? If so, do you have any suggestions? Thanks!
Background
What I've checked so far
MAGIC_TRACE_DEBUG
doesn't provide any extra output.-trace-include-kernel
or other similar modifications.Screenshots
Working
Blank
Perf Differences:
I'm wondering if this has something to do with the different versions of perf available on these machines.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions