You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
var schema = jsonApi.Joi.object().keys({
names: jsonApi.Joi.string()
.description('A combination of name elements as the field describes.')
.example('John Smith, etc.'),
});
Defining a resource as demonstrated above creates a valid, functioning json-api REST endpoint that works as expected. Producing :
{..."data":[{"type":"names","id":"cc5cca2e-0dd8-4b95-8cfc-a11230e73116",
"attributes":{"prefix":"Dr.","firstname":"Oli","lastname":"Rumbelow","suffix":"M.D.",
"formats":{"name":"LEVENTE WIKSTRÖM",}},
"links":{
"self":"http://localhost:16006/v1/names/cc5cca2e-0dd8-4b95-8cfc-a11230e73116"}
}
However, the graphIQL endpoint stops working correctly and reports:
{
"errors": [
{
"message": "The type of names.formats must be Output Type but got: [function GraphQLObjectType]."
},
{
"message": "Expected GraphQL named type but got: [function GraphQLObjectType]."
},
{
"message": "The type of namesWrite.formats must be Input Type but got: [function GraphQLObjectType]."
}
]
}
Is there a workaround for this so that nested objects can be used for both standard jsonapi rest and graphql? Does the framework support object nesting?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
var schema = jsonApi.Joi.object().keys({
names: jsonApi.Joi.string()
.description('A combination of name elements as the field describes.')
.example('John Smith, etc.'),
});
jsonApi.define({
namespace: 'json:api',
resource: 'names',
description: 'a collection of names',
handlers: namesHandler,
primaryKey: 'uuid',
searchParams: { query: jsonApi.Joi.string()},
attributes: {
prefix: jsonApi.Joi.string()
.optional()
.description('The persons prefix')
.example('Dr'),
firstname: jsonApi.Joi.string()
.description('The persons first name')
.example('John'),
middlename: jsonApi.Joi.string()
.optional()
.description('The persons middle name')
.example('Perry'),
lastname: jsonApi.Joi.string()
.description('The persons last name')
.example('Smith'),
suffix: jsonApi.Joi.string()
.optional()
.description('The persons suffix')
.example('Ph.D'),
formats: schema
.description('The formatted name.')
},
examples: [
{
id: 'cc5cca2e-0dd8-4b95-8cfc-a11230e73116',
type: 'names',
prefix: 'Dr.',
firstname: 'Oli',
lastname: 'Rumbelow',
suffix: 'M.D.',
formats: {
name: "LEVENTE WIKSTRÖM",
}
},
{
id: '32fb0105-acaa-4adb-9ec4-8b49633695e1',
type: 'names',
firstname: 'Pedro',
lastname: 'Romano',
},
]
})
Defining a resource as demonstrated above creates a valid, functioning json-api REST endpoint that works as expected. Producing :
{..."data":[{"type":"names","id":"cc5cca2e-0dd8-4b95-8cfc-a11230e73116",
"attributes":{"prefix":"Dr.","firstname":"Oli","lastname":"Rumbelow","suffix":"M.D.",
"formats":{"name":"LEVENTE WIKSTRÖM",}},
"links":{
"self":"http://localhost:16006/v1/names/cc5cca2e-0dd8-4b95-8cfc-a11230e73116"}
}
However, the graphIQL endpoint stops working correctly and reports:
{
"errors": [
{
"message": "The type of names.formats must be Output Type but got: [function GraphQLObjectType]."
},
{
"message": "Expected GraphQL named type but got: [function GraphQLObjectType]."
},
{
"message": "The type of namesWrite.formats must be Input Type but got: [function GraphQLObjectType]."
}
]
}
Is there a workaround for this so that nested objects can be used for both standard jsonapi rest and graphql? Does the framework support object nesting?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: