Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

distinction between nkit.rvz and rvz #23

Open
clad1984 opened this issue Apr 30, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

distinction between nkit.rvz and rvz #23

clad1984 opened this issue Apr 30, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@clad1984
Copy link

I want convert my whole collection of Nintendo Gamecube ROMs from Redump Verified ISOs to RVZs.
However, there is no current updated version DATs for Redumps in RVZ format.
I found this tool, had a test run on the rom "Gekkan Nintendo Tentou Demo 2005.10.1 (Japan)"
Two files I got here.

A. Gekkan Nintendo Tentou Demo 2005.10.1 (Japan).iso.rvz <- input :Redump-checked iso , output :rvz by dolphintool
B. Gekkan Nintendo Tentou Demo 2005.10.1 (Japan).nkitrvz.rvz <- DL from somewhere, the filename tells it's in nkit rvz format

I was expecting verifydump tells only A. is GOOD with latest Redump DAT file, but actually it says BOTH files are GOOD.

Loading` Datfile "Nintendo - GameCube - Datfile (1991) (2024-04-22 06-09-43).dat" from "kk.zip"
Datfile loaded successfully with 1991 games
Verifying dump file "C:\Gekkan Nintendo Tentou Demo 2005.10.1 (Japan).iso.rvz"
Verifying dump file "C:\Gekkan Nintendo Tentou Demo 2005.10.1 (Japan).nkitrvz.rvz"
2 dumps had errors:
Dump file "Gekkan Nintendo Tentou Demo 2005.10.1 (Japan).iso.rvz" found in Dat, but it should be named "Gekkan Nintendo Tentou Demo 2005.10.1 (Japan).rvz"
Dump file "Gekkan Nintendo Tentou Demo 2005.10.1 (Japan).nkitrvz.rvz" found in Dat, but it should be named "Gekkan Nintendo Tentou Demo 2005.10.1 (Japan).rvz"

Is there anything I misunderstood or it's just a bug ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant