Claims carried from the attestation request to the attestation

[rohe]

According to the spec the body of the Wallet Attestation JWT MUST contain among other claims:

• authorization_endpoint
• response_types_supported
• response_modes_supported
• vp_formats_supported
• request_object_signing_alg_values_supported
• presentation_definition_uri_supported

The only way the wallet provider can have gotten this information is by the attestation request and there the claims above are
not listed as required.
A slight mismatch.
Either the above listed claims should be required in both the request and the assertion or they should be optional.

[grausof]

Right, you are right. Only vp_formats_supported was already integrated. Fixed by #430