Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Files: UI for moving multiple files #943

Open
lidel opened this issue Jan 18, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

Files: UI for moving multiple files #943

lidel opened this issue Jan 18, 2019 · 3 comments
Labels
area/screen/files Issues related to Files screen effort/days Estimated to take multiple days, but less than a week exp/intermediate Prior experience is likely helpful kind/enhancement A net-new feature or improvement to an existing feature P1 High: Likely tackled by core team if no one steps up status/ready Ready to be worked topic/design-front-end Front-end implementation of UX/UI work topic/design-ux UX strategy, research, not solely visual design

Comments

@lidel
Copy link
Member

lidel commented Jan 18, 2019

This may be an unexpected feature, but one can move file by changing name to include path, for example to move a file one folder higher:

moving-1-file-2019-01-18--20-26-15

I was about to suggest renaming the label from "Rename" to "Move/Rename", but unfortunately "Rename" is disabled when more than one file is selected:

2019-01-18--20-30-09

TL;DR

We seem to be missing UI for "moving multiple files": right now only way to do it is via repeated drag&drop. One per each dir level, which makes it extremely painful if you want move /from/this/deep/dir/ to /some/other/one/.

@fsdiogo
Copy link
Contributor

fsdiogo commented Jan 23, 2019

Having Move/Rename in the same button will be confusing in my opinion, I'd prefer having a separate Move button that could be used while selecting multiple files/folders and would only accept valid paths.

Not sure if this is a priority, although surely it's a nice to have 👍

@fsdiogo fsdiogo added kind/discussion Topical discussion; usually not changes to codebase P2 Medium: Good to have, but can wait until someone steps up status/ready Ready to be worked labels Jan 23, 2019
@lidel
Copy link
Member Author

lidel commented Jan 25, 2019

Not a priority aright now, but it will get important when we start adding more and more things to MFS from various GUIs.

Some things in the pipeline:

First iteration could just accept and validate paths, but we probably need a smart realtime path completion (like this) to make it fast and useful enough for everyday use.

@jessicaschilling jessicaschilling added exp/intermediate Prior experience is likely helpful effort/days Estimated to take multiple days, but less than a week kind/enhancement A net-new feature or improvement to an existing feature topic/design-front-end Front-end implementation of UX/UI work topic/design-ux UX strategy, research, not solely visual design and removed kind/discussion Topical discussion; usually not changes to codebase labels Apr 6, 2020
@hsn10
Copy link

hsn10 commented Apr 12, 2020

Move to different folder is very important for me, I would like to move stuff uploaded by browser extension around easily.

@jessicaschilling jessicaschilling added P1 High: Likely tackled by core team if no one steps up and removed P2 Medium: Good to have, but can wait until someone steps up labels Apr 21, 2020
@lidel lidel added the area/screen/files Issues related to Files screen label Sep 15, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/screen/files Issues related to Files screen effort/days Estimated to take multiple days, but less than a week exp/intermediate Prior experience is likely helpful kind/enhancement A net-new feature or improvement to an existing feature P1 High: Likely tackled by core team if no one steps up status/ready Ready to be worked topic/design-front-end Front-end implementation of UX/UI work topic/design-ux UX strategy, research, not solely visual design
Projects
No open projects
Status: Needs Grooming
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants