docs(ADDRESSING): move dweb namespace to "future" section #151
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This removes the old definition of `dweb:` URI and provides context about ongoing discussions.
autonome
approved these changes
Aug 16, 2019
|
Should we also remove this from IPFS Desktop's handlers too? |
|
@hacdias I believe we should keep existing code in Companion / Desktop. Handlers are pretty stealth. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This PR removes the old definition of
dweb:URI and provides context about ongoing discussions.Motivation
Discussion in #150 identified alternative variant of
dwebprotocol handler that maintains Origin-based isolation. There is also an exploration into.dwebTLD that could serve similar purpose.Removing the
dweb:URI from the spec decreases the list of requirements for browser vendors and does not lock us into specific version of shareddwebnamespace (it needs revisiting before being added back to the spec).