Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat: Re-import InitializeKeyspace code from go-namesys #7984

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 22, 2021

Conversation

hsanjuan
Copy link
Contributor

The InitializeKeyspace functionality is go-ipfs specific but lives in the
go-namesys repo.

It is only called from initializeIpnsKeyspace, and therefore the code is
directly added to this function. The original function will be removed from
go-namesys.

The InitializeKeyspace functionality is go-ipfs specific but lives in the
go-namesys repo.

It is only called from initializeIpnsKeyspace, and therefore the code is
directly added to this function. The original function will be removed from
go-namesys.
@hsanjuan hsanjuan self-assigned this Mar 16, 2021
hsanjuan added a commit to ipfs/go-namesys that referenced this pull request Mar 16, 2021
This is mostly go-ipfs specific and has been moved there.

See ipfs/kubo#7984
@Stebalien Stebalien merged commit c9ee644 into master Mar 22, 2021
@Stebalien Stebalien deleted the feat/reimport-InitializeKeyspace-from-namesys branch March 22, 2021 18:16
@aschmahmann aschmahmann mentioned this pull request May 14, 2021
71 tasks
guseggert pushed a commit to ipfs/boxo that referenced this pull request Dec 6, 2022
This is mostly go-ipfs specific and has been moved there.

See ipfs/kubo#7984


This commit was moved from ipfs/go-namesys@67510bf
Jorropo pushed a commit to ipfs/go-libipfs-rapide that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2023
This is mostly go-ipfs specific and has been moved there.

See ipfs/kubo#7984


This commit was moved from ipfs/go-namesys@67510bf
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants