Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
30 lines (25 loc) · 1.82 KB

retiring-web2.md

File metadata and controls

30 lines (25 loc) · 1.82 KB

Retiring Web 2.0

Hosted by : @codynhat
Participants : @guolin, @listenaddress, @openworklabs, @autom(8)

We mainly had a discussion around how adoption of Web3 can increase and the use cases that are useful to different users.

Why would a user use Web3?

  • Censorship
  • Archiving data
  • Switching costs
  • Offline capabilities

Discussed the adoption curve. Web3 is still on innovators.

Other discussion points

  • Textile easy login with email may help adoption
  • Even if users could freely switch services and bring their data along, will companies still accumulate user data?
  • Autonomous cars and IoT may need p2p networks
    • What about 5G networks? The telecom industry is talking all about 5G to help autonomous cars, but not p2p networks
    • Autonomous cars communicating should literally mean they are communicating with each other directly, and not going through some server hundreds of miles away
  • Mesh networking needs p2p networks
  • Consumers don't need Web2 or Web3, they need use cases
  • Many Web3 technologies rely on people taking advantage of spare resources (blockchain mining, extra storage, etc). Can this scale?
  • What are technologies that need Web3, without being created from Web3 itself?
    • For example, blockchains are created from Web3, autonomous cars may need Web3
  • Discussed p2p chat apps like Firechat and how they handle network partitions
    • Would users adopt a p2p chat app just from the use case of being able to chat in large crowds with poor cell coverage?
  • Why would developers use Web3?
    • New business models are needed?