-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
support shape re-use through EXTENDS and ABSTRACT ? #7
Comments
The library currently implements this spec https://shexspec.github.io/spec/. The semantic of ABSTRACT and EXTENDS are currently discussed. When it will be define, I do plan to implement them. The goal of this library is to follow the current specification. |
Hi @jdusart our group has danced our way back around to wanting to model with the EXTENDS approach (suggested by @ericprud ). See issue thread over here for context if interested geneontology/go-shapes#197 . We are pretty tied to shex-java at the moment. Wondering if/when extends will be an option for us. I guess the question is when will they be a part of the current specification? |
Hi @goodb. Jérémie implemented the current version of the EXTENDS spec on the dev-extends branch. Have you tried it ? |
Hi @iovka no I hadn't seen that. I will put on my queue to give it a try soon. I hope you find some help here. This library has been very useful for us! I will do what little I can... |
The pre-release spec document includes some new keywords that are not currently parsed by the shex-java library (see section 5 in that doc).
Will these changes be incorporated here? More generally, what are the future prospects for this library?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: