We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
julia> i1 = Interval{Float64, Open, Closed}(1, 2) Interval{Float64,Open,Closed}(1.0, 2.0) julia> i2 = Interval{Float64, Open, Closed}(1, 2 + 1e-10) Interval{Float64,Open,Closed}(1.0, 2.00001) julia> i1 ≈ i2 ERROR: MethodError: no method matching isapprox(::Interval{Float64,Open,Closed}, ::Interval{Float64,Open,Closed})
How would this behaviour be defined?
The lower and upper bounds would have to be ≈ equal separately.
The closed/open distinction would be ignored.
If the underlying types don't have ≈ defined an error is thrown?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
How would this behaviour be defined?
The lower and upper bounds would have to be ≈ equal separately.
The closed/open distinction would be ignored.
If the underlying types don't have ≈ defined an error is thrown?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: