Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[cardano-api] Derive Eq instance for AcquiringFailure #4683

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 10, 2023

Conversation

ch1bo
Copy link
Contributor

@ch1bo ch1bo commented Nov 30, 2022

This is often used in tests where we would like to assert that we receive one or the other.

ch1bo added a commit to cardano-scaling/hydra that referenced this pull request Nov 30, 2022
This is to work around a missing Eq AcquiringFailure, see IntersectMBO/cardano-node#4683
ch1bo added a commit to cardano-scaling/hydra that referenced this pull request Nov 30, 2022
This is to work around a missing Eq AcquiringFailure, see IntersectMBO/cardano-node#4683
ch1bo added a commit to cardano-scaling/hydra that referenced this pull request Nov 30, 2022
This is to work around a missing Eq AcquiringFailure, see IntersectMBO/cardano-node#4683
ch1bo added a commit to cardano-scaling/hydra that referenced this pull request Nov 30, 2022
This is to work around a missing Eq AcquiringFailure, see IntersectMBO/cardano-node#4683
ch1bo added a commit to cardano-scaling/hydra that referenced this pull request Nov 30, 2022
This is to work around a missing Eq AcquiringFailure, see IntersectMBO/cardano-node#4683
ch1bo added a commit to cardano-scaling/hydra that referenced this pull request Nov 30, 2022
This is to work around a missing Eq AcquiringFailure, see IntersectMBO/cardano-node#4683
@@ -14,6 +14,8 @@

- **Breaking change** - Reduce exposed modules in cardano-api ([PR4546](https://github.com/input-output-hk/cardano-node/pull/4546))

- **Breaking change** Change return type of `queryNodeLocalState` to new `AcquiringFailure` type.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Where is this breaking change?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It was a breaking change. I intended to document the fact and why I ended up doing this PR -> our code down stream broke.

@newhoggy newhoggy force-pushed the ch1bo/cardano-api-acquiring-failure-eq-instance branch from 9d98394 to a339626 Compare March 1, 2023 02:09
This is often used in tests where we would like to assert that we
receive one or the other.
@newhoggy newhoggy force-pushed the ch1bo/cardano-api-acquiring-failure-eq-instance branch from a339626 to 3f7b997 Compare March 10, 2023 06:17
@newhoggy newhoggy enabled auto-merge March 10, 2023 06:44
@newhoggy newhoggy added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 10, 2023
Merged via the queue into master with commit 6f6d7d6 Mar 10, 2023
@iohk-bors iohk-bors bot deleted the ch1bo/cardano-api-acquiring-failure-eq-instance branch March 10, 2023 07:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants