Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MediaTemple #23

Open
indianajson opened this issue Jun 11, 2021 · 4 comments
Open

MediaTemple #23

indianajson opened this issue Jun 11, 2021 · 4 comments
Labels
Not Vulnerable This service is not vulnerable to takeover.

Comments

@indianajson
Copy link
Owner

indianajson commented Jun 11, 2021

Service MediaTemple (mt)

Status Not Vulnerable

Nameserver

ns1.mediatemple.net
ns2.mediatemple.net

Explanation

Media Temple now requires TXT verification before adding domains to your account, thus their service is no longer vulnerable. Thanks to @m0chan and @eur0pa for investigating this!

@indianajson indianajson added the Vulnerable This service is vulnerable to takeover. label Jun 11, 2021
@indianajson indianajson changed the title MediaTemple - Vulnerable MediaTemple Jun 12, 2021
@m0chan
Copy link

m0chan commented Jun 29, 2021

Not possible, domain requires TXT verification to create a zone file.

@indianajson
Copy link
Owner Author

Thanks for letting us know. Would you be willing to share a screenshot showing the interface requiring the TXT record? I'm just a bit surprised given the documentation just says change your nameservers. Thanks!

@eur0pa
Copy link

eur0pa commented Jul 29, 2021

Screen Shot 2021-07-29 at 10 02 13

@indianajson
Copy link
Owner Author

Thank you, @eur0pa! I have updated the list accordingly. 👍

@indianajson indianajson added Not Vulnerable This service is not vulnerable to takeover. and removed Vulnerable This service is vulnerable to takeover. labels Jul 29, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Not Vulnerable This service is not vulnerable to takeover.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants