-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Making new release for GAP 4.9 beta #8
Comments
Yes, I think it would be a good idea to avoid keeping the trans directory and package in parallel. As the groups are used extensively in examples and tests it would have to be a required package as ctbllib, tom and gapdoc are. As far as I recall, the Summer '16 version of the package provides all functionality that GAP 4.8 has and so should be included. I do not have a new release at hand and the 4.9 release of GAP should not wait for any package, at least not this one. However if there are concrete problems that something does not work (beyond ``it would be nice to have a fancier README file) please let me know and I will of course make a release in which these are fixed. |
Yes, as soon as the package will be picked up by the package update system and will work, the transition may look similar to the one I suggest at gap-system/gap#1650 (if you can review that PR, it would be great!). I will be happy to try to pick it up and see how it behaves in tests in Jenkins, and then let you know if there is anything. Just in case, GAPDoc is needed to run GAP, but CTblLib and TomLib are not. |
Scheduled for pick up in gap-system/gap-distribution@f838da5 - waiting to see what happens. |
Picked up, PackageInfo.g passed validation:
|
I had a look at Jenkins tests. Certainly, because it's not loaded by default, there are diffs like below, which should disappear as soon as it will be made needed to run GAP:
and
and
This overview may be also interesting:
|
Version 2.0 picked up - now in testing. |
I just packed an updated version with the latest changes. |
Thanks, but it does not pass validation:
In PackageInfo.g in
please put 03/11/2017. |
I believe this is resolved now. |
@hulpke we would like to make a complete transition from
small
,prim
andtrans
to SmallGrp, PrimGrp and TransGrp packages before releasing GAP 4.9 beta, i.e. GAP 4.9.0. How far isTransGrp
from being released? Shall I try to pick up the Summer 2016 version from http://www.math.colostate.edu/~hulpke/transgrp/, or wait for version 2.0? Would you be interested in hosting it on GitHub and using @fingolfin's ReleaseTools and GitHubPagesForGAP to create a website and automated releases?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: