Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add hot water distribution system elements #31

Closed
nmerket opened this issue May 29, 2015 · 3 comments · Fixed by #62
Closed

Add hot water distribution system elements #31

nmerket opened this issue May 29, 2015 · 3 comments · Fixed by #62

Comments

@nmerket
Copy link
Contributor

nmerket commented May 29, 2015

HPXML has water heating systems and water fixtures, but nothing about hot water distribution systems. That data is needed for RESNET's Hot Water Calculation Addendum A, which must be included in accredited HERS software and submitted to RESNET for accreditation by August 1, 2015. Here are the data inputs needed for the new hot water algorithms:

  • System type
    • Standard systems
      • piping length (ft)
    • Recirculation systems
      • Control type
        • No control or timer control
        • Temperature control
        • Demand control (presence sensor)
        • Demand control (manual)
      • Recirculation piping loop length (ft)
      • Branch piping length (ft)
      • Pump power (W)
  • Fixture flow efficiency (probably covered in WaterFixture, but should be reviewed)
    • Standard flow
    • Low flow
  • Piping insulation
    • None
    • R-3 (or better)
  • Drain Water Heat Recovery (DWHR) installed?
    • No
    • Yes
      • Facilities connected (one/all)
      • Equal flow? (yes/no)
      • DWHR Efficiency (%)
@nmerket nmerket added this to the v2.2 milestone May 29, 2015
@pfairey
Copy link

pfairey commented May 29, 2015

Thanks Noel

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Oct 15, 2015

@nmerket - some thoughts here.
Is there a reason to have piping insulation be an enumeration of different R-values? Would it be sufficient to have it be an integer that ranges from 0 to N, where N is a reasonable max?

Is the intent to be able to reference to the WaterFixture(s) elements which are attached to this system?

I assume the DWHR element's presence (or lack of presence) will be how one indicates if there is or is not one installed (i.e. that this isn't proposing a Boolean for that element)?

@nmerket
Copy link
Contributor Author

nmerket commented Oct 15, 2015

@kevinwoley
Or we could just be complete and just have the pipe R-value be a floating point number. I think that would be the way to go.

It's not clear to me yet how WaterFixture will relate. It seems most logical to have them be referenced with an id so as not to replicate data points.

Your assumption about DWHR is correct. That's generally the paradigm for other items in the standard.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants