Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

--check-github fails with old GitPython versions #1757

Closed
pescobar opened this issue May 11, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

--check-github fails with old GitPython versions #1757

pescobar opened this issue May 11, 2016 · 2 comments
Milestone

Comments

@pescobar
Copy link
Member

I tried eb --github-user=pescobar --check-github and I was getting this error:

Checking status of GitHub integration...

Making sure we're online... OK

* GitHub user... pescobar => OK
* GitHub token... fa1..5f5 (len: 40) => OK (validated)
* git command... OK ("git version 1.8.5.6; ")
* GitPython module... OK
* push access to pescobar/easybuild-easyconfigs repo @ GitHub... FAIL (unexpected exception: 'Remote' object has no attribute 'exists')
* creating gists... OK
* location to Git working dirs...  not found (suboptimal)

I was using python 2.6 and GitPython from centos6 epel repository GitPython-0.3.2-0.6.RC1.el6.noarch

After upgrading my GitPython installation doing easy_install -U --prefix=$HOME/.local GitPython the issue is fixed. It seems there is an problem with old GitPython versions. After the upgrade it's working:

All checks PASSed!

Status of GitHub integration:
* --from-pr: OK
* --new-pr: OK
* --review-pr: OK
* --update-pr: OK
* --upload-test-report: OK
@pescobar pescobar changed the title --check-github fails with old GitPython versions --check-github fails with old GitPython versions May 11, 2016
@boegel boegel added this to the v2.9.0 milestone May 11, 2016
@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented May 11, 2016

for future reference: latest GitPython version is 2.0.2 (i.e. the one that @pescobar is using) at this time

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Aug 4, 2016

fixed with #1847

@boegel boegel closed this as completed Aug 4, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants