You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When constructing an element and you want to supply explicit dimension ranges (or values, or any of the other Dimension attributes) you currently have to supply explicit Dimension objects or use redim after the fact:
I don't have any strong objection to this really. My main concern is that there may be too many ways of doing the same thing already and that impacts readability.
When constructing an element and you want to supply explicit dimension ranges (or values, or any of the other Dimension attributes) you currently have to supply explicit
Dimension
objects or useredim
after the fact:Being able to define Dimensions with dictionaries in the constructor can in some cases be nicer and more readable:
and also just matches what is already valid in
redim
:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: