Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sparse Fieldsets Compliance #269

Open
st3xupery opened this issue Apr 15, 2017 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #382
Open

Sparse Fieldsets Compliance #269

st3xupery opened this issue Apr 15, 2017 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #382

Comments

@st3xupery
Copy link
Contributor

When specifying particular fields for a resource, the system seems to ignore filtering relationships, including them all regardless of the client's requests. This does not comply with the specification sheet here

If a client requests a restricted set of fields for a given resource type, an endpoint MUST NOT include additional fields in resource objects of that type in its response.

Additionally, the term fields does include relationships as can be seen here

A resource object’s attributes and its relationships are collectively called its “fields”.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants