Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Question] Will this work with AWS MemoryDB ? #431

Open
rohitjha941 opened this issue Apr 7, 2022 · 6 comments
Open

[Question] Will this work with AWS MemoryDB ? #431

rohitjha941 opened this issue Apr 7, 2022 · 6 comments

Comments

@rohitjha941
Copy link

No description provided.

@hibiken
Copy link
Owner

hibiken commented Apr 8, 2022

@rohitjha941 Thank you for the question!

Currently, we don't support other message brokers other than Redis. Related feature request #173
But given that AWS MemoryDB is Redis compatible this may be easier to add support for.

If you don't mind, would you mind sharing why you'd use AWS MemoryDB instead of Redis?

@rohitjha941
Copy link
Author

I was thinking about using memory DB as it persists data during shutdown/failover and it is cheaper than running a managed Redis instance with failover.

@hibiken
Copy link
Owner

hibiken commented Apr 11, 2022

Makes sense. I'll look into this when I work on #173

@sudslab
Copy link

sudslab commented Jan 8, 2023

Any update on this? We are currently deployed in AWS - would be great to use a managed-cluster vs running our own on k8s. Thanks!

@chayim
Copy link

chayim commented Feb 15, 2023

@sudslab instead of memorydb have you thought about just using Redis Cloud? You don't have to handle any of the clustering, and get the same features?

@abit2
Copy link

abit2 commented Oct 1, 2024

Tried using memorydb cluster.

Failed to forward scheduled tasks: INTERNAL_ERROR: INTERNAL_ERROR: redis eval error: dial tcp xx.xxx.xxx.xx:6379: i/o timeout

Seems similar to this. redis/go-redis#2046

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants