-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 190
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Releasing version 3.1.2.0 #414
Comments
@kazu-yamamoto I've opened the v4 project https://github.com/haskell/network/projects/3 There is a column for "Proposed" where we can stack items that we think should be in. That can serve as an initial brainstorm. Then we can spend some time triaging that list. I actually added |
I'll spend some time formulating something. Even a domain specific exception like
@kazu-yamamoto I'm attempting to round up the current unreleased changes (see unreleased in the
As far as I'm aware, the only breaking change is the transformation of |
@eborden First of all, no rush. I can wait for your work. New
|
@eborden Nice work for changelog. Thanks. I think we should describe new extensible APIs: |
@kazu-yamamoto I might also debate whether removing |
v3.2 sounds good to me. At least, we can get back |
That is a solid design tradeoff for backwards compatibility. |
I'd support a deprecated pragma if PVP 1.1 was official, but as of today deprecation is still considered a breaking change. |
@eborden Could you confirm that If so, we can go forward step by step:
Let's drop |
|
@kazu-yamamoto I created a project to track progress on 3.1.2.0. |
Sounds good! |
@eborden Now it's your turn. Let's release v3.1.2.0. |
👍 I'll give the changelog a once over and get it released this evening. |
@eborden Gentle ping. |
@kazu-yamamoto I've updated https://github.com/haskell/network/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md to include 3.1.2.0. Many changes were not previously represented there. Please let me know if you see anything I missed or needs further clarification. After you have approved I'll packaged everything up and release. |
@eborden LGTM. Let's go. |
Please don't forget to make 3.1.1.0 and 3.1.1.1 deprecated due to the bug of |
|
I would like to discuss what features should be implemented in version 4. Please speak up.
I would like to have:
Strict
andStrictData
by defaultThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: