You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
Please do not leave "+1" or "me too" comments, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request
If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment. If the issue is assigned to the "modular-magician" user, it is either in the process of being autogenerated, or is planned to be autogenerated soon. If the issue is assigned to a user, that user is claiming responsibility for the issue. If the issue is assigned to "hashibot", a community member has claimed the issue already.
Description
We're creating a new set of terraform resources using mmv1 for the GKE On-Prem API. It's a separate API (gkeonprem.googleapis.com) from GKE (container.googleapis.com); however, we'd like the resource name to have the container prefix rather than our service name. Something like: google_container_bare_metal_cluster.
Following the MMV1 docs, results in google_gkeonprem_bare_metal_cluster. As far as I can tell, the resource name is taken from the 'name' field in products/gkeonprem/api.yaml file and the snakecased resource.
The Container product and product folder is already taken by GKE. We'd like to be able to override our product name without it conflicting with generated files from GKE.
When we attempt to change the Product.name field in the mmv1 api.yaml file. We end up with the error:
generate': google-beta/container_operation.go was already modified during this run.. check to see if there is both a .go and .go.erb version of this file (RuntimeError)
New or Affected Resource(s)
google_gkeonprem_bare_metal_cluster
google_gkeonprem_bare_metal_node_pool
Potential Terraform Configuration
# Propose what you think the configuration to take advantage of this feature should look like.# We may not use it verbatim, but it's helpful in understanding your intent.
It's intentional that services are split by service endpoint in their provider representations, and merging multiple endpoints into a single product prefix is undesirable.
Note that this is possible technically with legacy_name, but that's a feature used to support handwritten resources alongside generated one with a consistent naming convention when the handwritten resources differ from the generator default.
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.
If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.
Community Note
Description
We're creating a new set of terraform resources using mmv1 for the GKE On-Prem API. It's a separate API (gkeonprem.googleapis.com) from GKE (container.googleapis.com); however, we'd like the resource name to have the container prefix rather than our service name. Something like:
google_container_bare_metal_cluster
.Following the MMV1 docs, results in google_gkeonprem_bare_metal_cluster. As far as I can tell, the resource name is taken from the 'name' field in products/gkeonprem/api.yaml file and the snakecased resource.
The Container product and product folder is already taken by GKE. We'd like to be able to override our product name without it conflicting with generated files from GKE.
When we attempt to change the Product.name field in the mmv1 api.yaml file. We end up with the error:
New or Affected Resource(s)
Potential Terraform Configuration
References
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: