ServiceBus Topic Authorization Rules #736
Conversation
scottambroseio
changed the title
There was a problem hiding this comment.
hey @scottrangerio
Thanks for this PR - apologies for the delay in reviewing it!
I've taken a look through and left some comments in-line, but this mostly LGTM. If we can fix up the highlighted issues and rebase this - we should be able to kick of the tests and merge this :)
Thanks!
|
|
||
| if resp.StatusCode != http.StatusOK { | ||
| return fmt.Errorf("Error issuing Azure ARM delete request of ServiceBus Topic Authorization Rule '%s': %+v", name, err) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
checking the SDK here, the method above can return either a 200 or a 204 - can we change this to:
if err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("Error issuing Azure ARM delete request of ServiceBus Topic Authorization Rule %q (Resource Group %q): %+v", name, resGroup, err)
}
| Creates a new ServiceBus Topic authorization Rule within a ServiceBus Topic. | ||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| # azurerm\_servicebus\_topic\_authorization\_rule |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
can we remove the \ here? they're not needed
| } | ||
|
|
||
| resource "azurerm_servicebus_topic_authorization_rule" "test" { | ||
| name = "navi" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
could we make this examplerule?
|
Hey @tombuildsstuff No worries about the delay, it's nice to see the amount of activity this repo is gaining :) I've made said changes and rebased on top of master (first time using rebase so I hope I've done it right?). Any other issues just let me know and I'll try my best to resolve them. Cheers! |
|
Tests pass:
|
|
👋 hey @scottrangerio Just to let you know that support for this has just been released in v1.2.0 of the AzureRM Provider - full details of what's included are available here: https://github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-azurerm/blob/v1.2.0/CHANGELOG.md#120-march-02-2018 Thanks! |
|
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 hashibot-feedback@hashicorp.com. Thanks! |
ghost
locked and limited conversation to collaborators
Hey all o/
This PR addresses #735
Tests pass and output can be seen here https://gist.github.com/scottrangerio/501719dd8b5cd7f2915a5350690cd237
Also tested manually using the following .tf file
https://gist.github.com/scottrangerio/37fa55911682cdd1e32f8905c9e68c33
This is a near complete copy of the eventhub_authorization_rule resource, just tweaked for servicebus topics
Documentation still needs doing, but I'm happy to tackle that at some point next week when I get a bit more time!