Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request - Availability Zones #370

Closed
tomasquith opened this issue Sep 29, 2017 · 3 comments
Closed

Feature Request - Availability Zones #370

tomasquith opened this issue Sep 29, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@tomasquith
Copy link

Hi, Following the announcements at Ignite it would be nice to explore the Availability Zones functionality which is now in preview via terraform. It's in a limited preview at the moment, only being in the one US region. It would be good to trial this as it means we can closely replicate AWS in terms of availability.

What is the stance on supporting preview features via terraform?

https://azure.microsoft.com/en-gb/blog/introducing-azure-availability-zones-for-resiliency-and-high-availability/

@justaugustus
Copy link
Contributor

@metacpp pinging you on this one, as you assigned yourself to #579.

@tombuildsstuff tombuildsstuff modified the milestones: 1.1.2, 1.1.3 Feb 10, 2018
@tombuildsstuff tombuildsstuff modified the milestones: 1.1.3, 1.1.4 Feb 28, 2018
@tombuildsstuff
Copy link
Contributor

Support for this was added in #811 - closing.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 31, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 hashibot-feedback@hashicorp.com. Thanks!

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 31, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants